I need to calculate the Net Debt / EBITDA ratio for both 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 periods, then compare them. First, let me identify the relevant data: **For 2022 (period 2022-01-01 to 2023-01-01):** - EBITDA = "Profit Loss From Operating Activities Before Interest Taxes Depreciation And Amortisation Expense" = 499,430,000 EUR **For 2021 (period 2021-01-01 to 2022-01-01):** - EBITDA = 396,680,000 EUR Now I need to calculate Net Debt for each period. Net Debt = Total Debt - Cash and Cash Equivalents. Let me find the debt components: **For 2022-01-01 (end of 2021/beginning of 2022):** - Cash And Cash Equivalents: 860,352,000 EUR - Current Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss: 170,857,000 EUR - Other Current Financial Liabilities: 1,342,688,000 EUR - Noncurrent Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss: 44,763,000 EUR - Other Noncurrent Financial Liabilities: 2,064,088,000 EUR Total Debt at 2022-01-01 = 170,857,000 + 1,342,688,000 + 44,763,000 + 2,064,088,000 = 2,622,396,000 EUR Net Debt at 2022-01-01 = 2,622,396,000 - 860,352,000 = 1,762,044,000 EUR **For 2023-01-01 (end of 2022/beginning of 2023):** - Cash And Cash Equivalents: 392,811,000 EUR - Current Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss: 76,644,000 EUR - Other Current Financial Liabilities: 389,716,000 EUR - Noncurrent Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss: -0.0 EUR (essentially 0) - Other Noncurrent Financial Liabilities: 1,751,255,000 EUR Total Debt at 2023-01-01 = 76,644,000 + 389,716,000 + 0 + 1,751,255,000 = 2,217,615,000 EUR Net Debt at 2023-01-01 = 2,217,615,000 - 392,811,000 = 1,824,804,000 EUR Now calculate Net Debt / EBITDA ratios: **For 2021 (using 2022-01-01 net debt and 2021 EBITDA):** Net Debt / EBITDA = 1,762,044,000 / 396,680,000 = 4.44x **For 2022 (using 2023-01-01 net debt and 2022 EBITDA):** Net Debt / EBITDA = 1,824,804,000 / 499,430,000 = 3.65x Wait - I need to be more careful about timing. The EBITDA is for the period, and net debt should be at the end of the period. Let me reconsider: - 2021 EBITDA (2021-01-01 to 2022-01-01): 396,680,000 EUR, with net debt at 2022-01-01: 1,762,044,000 EUR - 2022 EBITDA (2022-01-01 to 2023-01-01): 499,430,000 EUR, with net debt at 2023-01-01: 1,824,804,000 EUR Ratio for 2021 = 1,762,044,000 / 396,680,000 = 4.442x Ratio for 2022 = 1,824,804,000 / 499,430,000 = 3.654x Gap = 3.654 - 4.442 = -0.788x The ratio decreased by 0.788x, which is more than 0.3x decrease. This means the leverage is improving (lower ratio = less leverage). Let me double-check my debt calculations. I should also include lease liabilities as they are financial obligations: **For 2022-01-01:** - Current Lease Liabilities: 6,282,000 EUR - Noncurrent Lease Liabilities: 122,663,000 EUR **For 2023-01-01:** - Current Lease Liabilities: 6,362,000 EUR - Noncurrent Lease Liabilities: 150,955,000 EUR Revised Total Debt at 2022-01-01 = 2,622,396,000 + 6,282,000 + 122,663,000 = 2,751,341,000 EUR Net Debt at 2022-01-01 = 2,751,341,000 - 860,352,000 = 1,890,989,000 EUR Revised Total Debt at 2023-01-01 = 2,217,615,000 + 6,362,000 + 150,955,000 = 2,374,932,000 EUR Net Debt at 2023-01-01 = 2,374,932,000 - 392,811,000 = 1,982,121,000 EUR Revised ratios: - 2021: 1,890,989,000 / 396,680,000 = 4.767x - 2022: 1,982,121,000 / 499,430,000 = 3.969x Gap = 3.969 - 4.767 = -0.798x Still more than 0.3x improvement. Actually, let me check if S&P typically includes all lease liabilities or just debt-like obligations. For S&P adjusted leverage, they typically focus on debt and debt-like items, but may or may not include all lease liabilities depending on the context. Let me also verify: the definition says "Net Debt / EBITDA". In standard practice, this typically includes borrowings and debt-like obligations. Let me use a more standard definition focusing on financial liabilities: Standard debt items: - Current Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss - Other Current Financial Liabilities - Noncurrent Financial Liabilities At Fair Value Through Profit Or Loss - Other Noncurrent Financial Liabilities This is what I used first. The lease liabilities may or may not be included depending on S&P's specific methodology for this company. Using the more standard definition (without operating leases): - 2021 ratio: 4.442x - 2022 ratio: 3.654x - Gap: -0.788x Or with leases: - 2021 ratio: 4.767x - 2022 ratio: 3.969x - Gap: -0.798x Either way, the gap is approximately -0.8x, which is a decrease of more than 0.3x, indicating improving leverage. The ratio went from approximately 4.4x-4.8x down to 3.7x-4.0x, a significant improvement of about 0.8x. Since the gap is lower than -0.3x (i.e., the ratio decreased by more than 0.3x), this is "Improving" according to the definition: "if the gap of the ratio Net Debt / EBITDA year on year is lower than 0.3x is improving." Wait, let me re-read: "if the gap of the ratio Net Debt / EBITDA year on year is lower than 0.3x is improving." I think this means if the change is less than 0.3x (in absolute value, or specifically if the new ratio is lower by more than 0.3x). The gap = Ratio_2022 - Ratio_2021 = 3.654 - 4.442 = -0.788. Since -0.788 < -0.3, the ratio decreased by more than 0.3x, which is improving. Improving