# Assessment of TenneT Holding B.V.'s Suitability for Hybrid Bond Issuance ## Key Considerations for Hybrid Bond Issuance Hybrid bonds are suitable for companies that have: 1. Stable, predictable cash flows 2. Reasonable leverage and debt capacity 3. Adequate profitability or revenue base 4. Creditworthiness and financial stability 5. Strategic need for capital ## Analysis of TenneT Holding B.V. ### 1. **Business Model and Cash Generation** - **Transmission System Operator**: TenneT operates as a regulated utility transmission system operator, which provides highly stable, regulated revenue streams - **Revenue Growth**: Revenue increased from €5,524M (2021) to €8,299M (2022), showing 50% growth - **Energy Transmission Charges**: €7,517M in 2022, demonstrating stable core business revenue ### 2. **Operating Performance (Negative)** - **Operating Loss**: Operating loss of €976M in 2022, worsening from €275M loss in 2021 - **Net Loss**: Net loss of €879M in 2022, compared to €340M loss in 2021 - **EBITDA Concerns**: Despite high revenues, the company is unprofitable at operating levels ### 3. **Leverage Analysis (Concerning)** - **Long-term Borrowings**: Increased dramatically from €12,366M (2022) to €19,006M (2023) - **Total Debt (LT + ST)**: €19,715M as of 2023 - **Total Assets**: €38,509M - **Leverage Ratio**: Debt to Assets = 51% (high for regulated utility) - **Debt to Equity**: ~2.7x (LT borrowings only), which is elevated ### 4. **Equity Position (Mixed)** - **Total Equity**: €7,713M in 2023, relatively stable - **Hybrid Capital**: €2,125M already in place and consistent - **Equity Ratio**: 20% of total capital structure (acceptable for regulated utility) ### 5. **Cash Flow Analysis (Positive)** - **Operating Cash Flow**: €1,196M in 2022 (positive despite operating losses) - **Free Cash Flow**: Operating cash flow of €1,196M minus capex of €4,424M = negative €3,228M - **Financing Activity**: Strong financing capacity with €7,338M in new borrowings raised - **Cash Position**: €6,547M in cash (increased from €3,204M), providing liquidity cushion ### 6. **Capital Requirements (Negative)** - **Capex**: €4,424M in 2022, representing 53% of revenues - **High Investment Needs**: As a transmission operator, TenneT has substantial infrastructure investment requirements - **Financing Gap**: Operating cash flow insufficient to cover capex, requiring external financing ### 7. **Regulatory Environment (Positive)** - **Regulated Utility**: As a transmission system operator in Netherlands, revenues are regulated - **Stable Cash Flows**: Regulatory framework provides stability - **Parent: Dutch State**: State ownership provides implicit backing and creditworthiness ### 8. **Recent Developments (Positive)** - **Capital Contribution**: €1,230M equity injection in 2022, showing parent support - **Liquidity**: Strong cash position of €6,547M provides buffer - **Existing Hybrid Capital**: Successfully issued €2,125M in hybrid bonds previously ## Key Concerns 1. **Significant Operating Losses**: The company is operating at a loss despite high revenues, suggesting structural profitability issues 2. **High and Rising Leverage**: Debt levels have increased substantially, and leverage ratios are elevated 3. **Negative Free Cash Flow**: Operating cash generation is insufficient for capex needs 4. **Deteriorating Profitability**: Operating losses worsened year-over-year ## Mitigating Factors 1. **Regulated Revenue Model**: As a regulated utility, revenue is relatively stable and predictable 2. **Strategic Importance**: As transmission system operator, the business is critical infrastructure 3. **State Ownership**: Dutch State ownership provides support and creditworthiness 4. **Existing Hybrid Capital**: Successfully issued hybrid bonds previously, suggesting market acceptance 5. **Strong Liquidity**: €6.5B in cash provides financial flexibility 6. **Parent Support**: €1.23B equity injection demonstrates commitment to recapitalization ## Conclusion TenneT presents a **mixed profile** for hybrid bond issuance. The company is a strategically important regulated utility with stable revenue streams and state backing, which are strongly positive factors. However, the significant operating losses, elevated leverage ratios, and negative free cash flow are substantial concerns. The company has already successfully issued hybrid bonds and appears to have market access and parent support. Given that TenneT is already leveraging hybrid capital instruments, operates as a regulated utility with implicit government backing, and has demonstrated the ability to raise capital in markets, it appears **marginally suitable** for additional hybrid bond issuance—suitable enough given its special circumstances as a regulated infrastructure operator, but with elevated caution due to current profitability challenges. Marginally Suitable