Veolia appears to be a reasonably suitable issuer of hybrid bonds, though not without leverage and cash-flow considerations. Key points supporting suitability: - Large, established issuer: Veolia is a major utility/environmental services group with €42.9bn revenue in 2022 and €73.3bn total assets at 2023-01-01. Scale and recurring infrastructure-like activities are generally supportive for hybrid bond issuance. - Positive profitability: Net profit rose to €997.6m in 2022 from €554.9m in 2021, and profit attributable to owners increased to €715.8m. Operating income before equity-accounted entities also increased materially to €2.21bn. - Strong operating cash generation: Cash flow from operating activities was €4.15bn in 2022, up from €3.15bn in 2021. - Existing hybrid/deeply subordinated capital structure: The company already has “deeply subordinated securities” within equity, increasing from €2.46bn to €3.50bn, including contribution of Suez hybrid debt. This indicates market familiarity and corporate willingness/ability to use hybrid-like instruments. - Equity base is meaningful: Total equity was €14.87bn at 2023-01-01, up from €12.77bn, providing some balance-sheet cushion. - Interest coverage appears acceptable: Operating income after equity-accounted entities was €2.33bn versus net finance costs of €632.7m, implying coverage of roughly 3.7x before considering other finance costs. Main constraints: - High financial leverage: Noncurrent financial liabilities excluding concession liabilities nearly doubled to €19.69bn, and total financial/lease/concession liabilities are substantial. - Financing cash flows were sharply negative in 2022, mainly from deleveraging/current borrowing reduction and dividends. - Hybrid coupons already increased significantly, from €23.9m to €88.3m, and additional hybrid issuance would add fixed or deferrable financing burden. - Equity attributable to owners is only €12.25bn against total assets of €73.3bn, so balance-sheet leverage remains high. Overall, Veolia has the scale, profitability, operating cash flows, existing hybrid track record, and infrastructure-like business profile to support hybrid bond issuance. However, elevated debt and acquisition-related balance-sheet expansion mean the suitability is not unequivocally “strong” from the data alone. A cautious positive assessment is most appropriate. Marginally Suitable